Social networking sites must do more to protect their child users
9th October 2007
THREE of the most popular social networking sites on the Internet are not doing enough to protect their child users, an independent expert audit has concluded.
The investigation by web usability consultants at User Vision, one of Europe’s leading independent user experience companies, found that Facebook, Bebo and MySpace all lacked targeted, clear information about online security for under 18s.
People are more worried than ever before about identity theft and protecting children from predatory adults, yet social networking sites which rely on users giving out as many details about themselves as possible have never been more popular.
Sites such as Facebook, Bebo and MySpace have become lucrative targets for advertisers. User Vision’s experts believe all three sites have a “social and corporate responsibility” to replace at least one-in-50 views of these highly visible spaces with a warning about safety online on the profiles of their members who are under 18.
During the User Vision usability evaluation, one of the Edinburgh-based team signed up to Bebo giving only his name and city location yet almost every morning he found at least three emails from people he did not know asking to be his Bebo “friend”. In another example of quite how many friends someone can accumulate on MySpace, the singer Lily Allen has a running total of nearly 420,000 friends.
User Vision’s evaluation found that MySpace was similar to Facebook in not giving any prominent security warnings to children users. It was the only one of the three social networking sites to ask users to give their postcode, a policy Emma Kirk said raised particular security and privacy questions especially for children. However, at the stage where a new user on MySpace reaches the point of being encouraged to upload some photographs there is a series of warnings given about the risks.
Emma Kirk said: “Children and young adults in their teens aren’t overly concerned with their information privacy. So the issue here may not be how these sites word their privacy policies but rather one of making privacy a concept that is accessible to teenagers. “Individually targeted advertising is becoming an increasingly prevalent tactic on the web, so social networking sites could target their privacy advertising at their users they know to be under 18. “At the end of the day, choice would still be with the user – but at least they would be better informed.”